Where I commonly write about sports, in an uncommon way.
Showing posts with label Tennis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tennis. Show all posts

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Updates on Previous Posts

Issue: You actually have anything worth updating?

Short Answer: Ehh.  Maybe.

Reasoning: I haven't been watching much in the way of sports lately.  Turns out this "work" thing kind of gets in the way.  Oh, that and "playing golf" seems to get in the way as well.  So, with the College World Series just ending, the Reds playing average baseball, Wimbledon coming to an end, and millionaire football players not getting along with their billionaire bosses - I'm not sure there is much to write about right now anyway.  So, I am going to update you on the recent happenings relating to some of my older posts.  It is much more interesting than it sounds, trust me.  Here we go:
  1. At the end of January I wrote this post about how awesome Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal are.  At the end of the post (go ahead and scroll down, it's ok) I wrote a "runner-up" for the Odd Stat of the Week, which stated that Roger Federer was 166-0 in majors, when winning the first two sets.  Through the first four rounds of Wimbledon, he had run his record to 178-0 (this included this year's French Open as well).  However, Federer's record now sits at 178-1 after losing to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (3-6, 6-7, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4) in the Quarterfinals at Wimbledon.  You knew it was coming sooner or later, but I don't think anyone thought the streak would end with a loss to world powerhouse Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.  Roger is just getting old.
  2. In early March, at the height of the Charlie Sheen scandal(s), I wrote this post about his association with the Cincinnati Reds.  Charlie Sheen, ladies and gentlemen, is still at it.  In the upcoming Sports Illustrated magazine, Sheen admits "that he took steroids 'for like six or eight weeks' while filming the 1989 movie 'Major League.'  He adds that the performance-enhancing drugs helped his fastball go from 79 mph to 85 mph."  Talk about dedication.  The man played a Major League player in a movie, so, he figured he would do everything a true Major Leaguer does.  Including steroids.  I love that his fastball gained 6 mph of velocity, going from "batting practice" to "ridiculously hittable."  And, all he had to pay for it was some bacne (a shorthand word combining back + acne) and a few mood swings.  Sheen even admitted the steriods "made him a bit more irritable than normal."  That seems a bit scary.
  3. At the beginning of May I wrote this post, challenging a top-10 list of the worst sports movies ever.  I disagreed with a few, and wrote my opinion on what makes a good sports movie.  Well, I watched a sports movie the other day that belongs on, or near, the top-10 list of worst sports movies ever.  And I'm sure most people will think I'm crazy.  Remember the Titans is downright awful.  The underlying message is great, and the director did a great job showing how difficult the times were for all students, black and white.  But, outside of that, it has to be the cheesiest sports movie EVER.  Hands down.  Seriously, watch the movie strictly from a sports standpoint next time.  It's a joke.  There is a lot of singing, a lot of dancing, and a main character (Gerry Bertier - played by Ryan Hurst) who doesn't do one thing in the movie that ISN'T cheesy.  Do me a favor and watch any part of the movie where the team is "dancing" during warm-ups or when they come up with their new "hip" entrance to the field - and watch only for Ryan Hurst.  It is absolutely hilarious.  Oh, and the fact that the movie is "based" on a true story doesn't mean Hollywood gave you the true story.
  4. At the end of April I wrote this post about the NBA and NHL playoffs.  In the post I wrote "Jason Kidd will be the reason the Mavs lose" in the playoffs.  Uhhh, you see why I don't write much about the NBA?  I thought Jason Kidd was terrible.  Turns out, not only is he not terrible, but the Mavericks are the Champions of the NBA thanks in large part to him.  Oh, and that Dirk guy.  No more NBA predictions from me - ever.
  5. Finally, back in January I wrote this post about the return of Tiger Woods (then wrote this one about Tiger hocking a loogey on the green, then this one about Tiger losing in the first round of the Match Play Championship, then this one about Tiger at the Masters, then this one about Tiger withdrawing from the Players Championship).  Well, I'm here to report that Tiger is not back yet, and he may not be back for awhile.  If you heard his press conference this week (to promote his tournament - one he won't be playing in) you heard a man who sounds defeated - a man who doesn't believe in himself anymore.  The old Tiger would have sat there and defiantly talked about how he would kick Rory McIlroy's ass once he came back.  But, the new Tiger danced around questions, and used words like "hopefully," "should," and "probably."  The old Tiger would have said "yes," "no," and "kiss my a#& you stupid mother [bleeper]."  Tiger needs a mental coach badly.  He needs someone to build up his ego, because his ego is what separated him from the rest of the golf world.  Back in the day, Tiger didn't think he was the best golfer in the world, he knew it.  If he gets back to that, he'll win again.  If he doesn't, he won't.  For every one's sake, I hope he does.  But, it doesn't sound like he will.  I guess watching Rory will have to suffice for now.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

The Odd Stat of the Week

Issue: No football this week.  Where are you going to go for your stat?

Short Answer: How about tennis?

Reasoning: I can honestly say that I have yet to watch a single point during the Australian Open.  It is the first major of the year in the great sport of tennis, and, I can honestly say, I don't care.  Tennis is fine.  I don't mind it.  I have watched a match or two in my life.  I even enjoy watching Wimbledon - something about playing tennis on grass.  I don't know.  Maybe I don't care so much about tennis because I stink at it.  Sure, I am competent - I can hit the ball over the net, and I bet I could beat most people that are reading this - but, if I played against someone who was good, I would be made a fool of.  Let me tell you how I know this.

Allow me to take you back to the year 1999.  I was a 20 year old sophomore at Georgia Tech.  A good buddy and teammate of mine, Derek, was dating a girl who played on the tennis team.  I too happened to be "seeing" a girl on the tennis team (I'm not going to mention her name, but she is married to someone famous now.  Kinda weird.).  Somehow a conversation came up of which the result was this: sure, Derek and I will play you guys in tennis, and I bet we can hold our own.  Hell, I bet we can win.  We are dudes, and dudes don't lose to chicks at anything.  Obviously Derek and I weren't THAT sure of ourselves.  And, after a short warm-up period, any confidence we did have, was shattered.  Our damage control systems kicked in, and we agreed with the girls that maybe we needed a little head start.  We wanted 2 games.  They gave us 5.    A 5-0 lead in each set.  We could actually win this thing now.  Right?  Not quite.  Final tally?  7-5, 7-5.  I think we won 3 points the whole time.  I really never expected to win, but I didn't expect to be humiliated.  Lesson learned.  If you can't even serve over-handed, you probably aren't going to beat division-one tennis players.  Even if they are chicks.

Anyway.  This upcoming men's Australian Open final will be only the third major final since 2004 to not feature either Rafael Nadal or Roger Federer (or most likely, both of them).  The 2008 Australian Open final featured Novak Djokovic defeating Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.  The 2005 Australian Open featured Marat Safin defeating Lleyton Hewitt.  That's right, every single French Open final, every single Wimbledon final, and every single U.S. Open final has featured either Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal, since 2004.  25 total grand slam finals (counting the 2011 Australian).  22 have had Nadal or Federer.  7 ('06, '07, '08 Wimbledon, '06, '07, '08 French, and '09 Australian) have actually had both at the same time (Nadal is 5-2, but 3-0 at the French Open).  Federer has 18 grand slam finals appearances.  Nadal has 11 appearances.  These. Dudes. Are. Beasts.  Pretty sure either of them could handle me and Derek.

Runner-up for odd stat of the week: Roger Federer's career record, at a major, when winning the first two sets - 166-0.